One of the bullish arguments that I have repeatedly heard during...

One of the bullish arguments that I have repeatedly heard during the latest pullback is that consumer sentiment shows how wrong I am. Indeed Reuters is reporting July consumer confidence at 6-year high. BEA 4th Quarter GDP 1st Estimate 0.7% Q&A: Why Did GDPNow Rise After Durable Goods? When are Construction Revisions Coming? One of the bullish arguments that I have repeatedly heard during the latest pullback is that consumer sentiment shows how wrong I am. Indeed Reuters is reporting Consumer confidence rose to a nearly six-year high in July as consumers perceived improvements in business conditions and the labor market, a report said on Tuesday. The Conference Board said its index of consumer sentiment rose to 112.6 in July, the highest reading since August 2001 and above an upwardly revised 105.3 in June. 'An improvement in business conditions and the job market has lifted consumers' spirits in July,' said Lynn Franco, director of The Conference Board Consumer Research Center, in a press release. The reading was well above expectations. The median forecast of economists polled by Reuters was for 105.0, up from an originally reported 103.9 in June. 'Looking ahead, consumers are more upbeat about short-term economic prospects, mainly the result of a decline in the number of pessimists, not an increase in the number of optimists. This rebound in confidence suggests economic activity may gather a little momentum in the coming months,' Franco said. Wow. That's stunning is it not? Wait a second. I think I mean perplexing. I do not know the exact nature of the survey but whatever it is I think it is seriously flawed. I can hear the chimes now 'Of course you think it's flawed you are a bear'. My response is that 'I think it's flawed because it is flawed, and I will offer proof. I have no legal background but in case I am wrong about it being flawed I offer this second opinion: Even if it's not flawed, the consumer confidence survey is useless.' I discussed the stock market, consumer sentiment, housing permits, money supply and the yield curve. It is surprising how few of those ' ' actually lead. The post was made back in January so apologies offered for the fact that the following chat is not current but I think the idea is still valid. As far as recessions go consumer confidence sure is not leading. More to the point, look at the chart and see countless dips below 0% with the stock market rising in most of them. Inquiring minds no doubt are not convinced on such flimsy evidence (and who can blame them) so I propose we take a look at gasoline prices. I was thinking about the recent rise in consumer sentiment and I was asking 'How can this be? What has changed? Is the economy really getting better? ' Then it occurred to me that gasoline prices have been falling. That is odd given that crude prices have been rising and are near all time highs. Nonetheless consumers do not give a damn about crude prices. They do, however, care about gasoline prices. And gasoline prices here have recently fallen over $.45 on Thursday and asked him to put together a chart of consumer sentiment vs. gasoline prices for me. Bart was happy to oblige. Thanks Bart. Here is that chart. Mish notes: In the above chart, gasoline prices are declining in scale. The previous reference to a 6 year consumer confidence high is based on the Conference Board Consumer Research Center, not the University of Michigan consumer sentiment index (we used the data we had). I expected an inverse correlation lately between the UOM sentiment index and gasoline prices but I sure did not expect a near perfect inverse correlation. I asked Bart to go back as far as he could to see if the correlation held. Bart took it back to 1995. From 1995 to 1999 there simply was no correlation. Could it be because gasoline prices were range bound between $.93 and $1.30 for those 5 years and now we have seen prices soar above $3.50? Inquiring minds are no doubt asking 'What happened? '. The above chart should make it clear: As gasoline prices rose above $2.00 (roughly January 2004), consumer sentiment based on the University of Michigan Survey has been perfectly inverse correlated to gasoline prices. More than two-thirds of Americans believe the U. S. economy is either in recession now or will be in the next year, a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows. That assessment comes despite the fact the economy has experienced sustained growth with low inflation and unemployment and generally rising stock values ever since the recession that ended early in President Bush's tenure. In addition, the poll shows a lack of confidence in economic leaders. That includes not just Mr. Bush and Congress, both of whom have the approval of fewer than one-third of all Americans, but the financial industry, large corporations in general and energy, drug and insurance companies in particular. 'There's a combination of anxiety and loathing,' Mr. Hart said. 'There's a sense that every single one of these institutions is totally out for their own betterment, versus the public they serve.' The poll shows Wall Street itself is a target of public ire. Just 16% expressed substantial confidence in the financial industry, slightly below those expressing confidence in the energy industry (18%) or the pharmaceutical industry (17%). Large corporations (11%) and health-insurance companies in particular (10%) fared even worse. One bright spot for the world of commerce: 54% of Americans expressed high confidence in small businesses, which tied with law-enforcement agencies for the second ranking behind the U. S. military among institutions rated by respondents. The University of Michigan index is nowhere near a six year high but is perfectly inverse correlated to gasoline prices ever since gasoline prices rose above $2.00 (January 2004). The NBC news poll shows more than two-thirds of Americans believe the U. S. economy is either in recession now or will be in the next year. The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.